Welcome to Atheist Discussion, a new community created by former members of The Thinking Atheist forum.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
#1

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
Here's one video that made it into numerous WWI and WWII documentaries, but never for what it really shows.



It's the sinking of the Austro Hungarian battleship Szent Istvan in 1918, filmed from it's sister Prinz Eugen. Looks dramatic, but only 88 perished out of a crew of more than a thousand.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
The following 2 users Like abaris's post:
  • Deesse23, Thumpalumpacus
Reply
#2

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
Every tank was a Sherman, every fighter a P-51.
[Image: M-Spr20-Weapons-FEATURED-1-1200x350-c-default.jpg]
The following 2 users Like Gawdzilla Sama's post:
  • Fireball, skyking
Reply
#3

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
I think I asked you one time about the guns being trained out to the opposite side of the damage.  I believe you said it was an attempt to counter the flooding.
Robert G. Ingersoll : “No man with a sense of humor ever founded a religion.”
The following 2 users Like Minimalist's post:
  • Gawdzilla Sama, Deesse23
Reply
#4

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-28-2019, 11:30 PM)Minimalist Wrote: I think I asked you one time about the guns being trained out to the opposite side of the damage.  I believe you said it was an attempt to counter the flooding.

SOP.
[Image: M-Spr20-Weapons-FEATURED-1-1200x350-c-default.jpg]
Reply
#5

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
Another one is the destruction of the HMS Barham. Any time a battleship is sunk, it just happens to be the Barham blowing up.

Casualties were of course much heavier aboard the British ship.



At 00:23, you can see 80' pieces of ship being flung hundreds of feet in the air.
On hiatus.
The following 3 users Like Thumpalumpacus's post:
  • Deesse23, abaris, skyking
Reply
#6

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
The Hindenburg disaster.   

                                                         T4618
Reply
#7

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
Quote: Any time a battleship is sunk, it just happens to be the Barham blowing up.




You have to admit that it isn't the kind of thing that happens much anymore.
Robert G. Ingersoll : “No man with a sense of humor ever founded a religion.”
The following 1 user Likes Minimalist's post:
  • Thumpalumpacus
Reply
#8

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 03:16 AM)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote: Any time a battleship is sunk, it just happens to be the Barham blowing up.



You have to admit that it isn't the kind of thing that happens much anymore.

I ain't wanting to build ships that blow up like that myself.
On hiatus.
Reply
#9

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
Admiral Beatty made a similar observation at Jutland:

Quote:There seems to be something wrong with our bloody ships today", after two of his ships exploded.


Decidedly bad form in the middle of a battle.
Robert G. Ingersoll : “No man with a sense of humor ever founded a religion.”
The following 1 user Likes Minimalist's post:
  • Thumpalumpacus
Reply
#10

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 05:11 AM)Minimalist Wrote: Admiral Beatty made a similar observation at Jutland:

Quote:There seems to be something wrong with our bloody ships today", after two of his ships exploded.


Decidedly bad form in the middle of a battle.

Classic English understatement.
On hiatus.
The following 1 user Likes Thumpalumpacus's post:
  • Mathilda
Reply
#11

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-28-2019, 11:30 PM)Minimalist Wrote: I think I asked you one time about the guns being trained out to the opposite side of the damage.  I believe you said it was an attempt to counter the flooding.

Yeah, it was. The vessel kept floating for several hours. They already prepared a cable to tow it to port, but the cable snapped and in the end the damage was too extensive to keep it floating.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#12

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 02:43 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Another one is the destruction of the HMS Barham. Any time a battleship is sunk, it just happens to be the Barham blowing up.

Casualties were of course much heavier aboard the British ship.



At 00:23, you can see 80' pieces of ship being flung hundreds of feet in the air.

Yeah, that's abused just as often. They usually look for dramatic footage and nevermind the real context. I have seen it quite often but didn't know what it really shows.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#13

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-28-2019, 08:11 PM)abaris Wrote: Looks dramatic, but only 88 perished out of a crew of more than a thousand.

What a very odd thing to say.
Step on the gas and wipe that tear away...
The following 1 user Likes Vivian Darkbloom's post:
  • Aroura
Reply
#14

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 02:46 PM)Vivian Darkbloom Wrote: What a very odd thing to say.

If you look at the usual number of casualties in a naval battle of these days, very few lives were lost in comparison. In the second war, only three sailors survived the sinking of the Hood and a few days later, when british forces retaliated, only 123 survived the destruction of the Bismarck.


In the battle of Jutland ships simply exploded, killing nearly everyone. So yes, most of the crew surviving was pretty rare.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
The following 2 users Like abaris's post:
  • Thumpalumpacus, skyking
Reply
#15

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 04:48 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 03:16 AM)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote: Any time a battleship is sunk, it just happens to be the Barham blowing up.



You have to admit that it isn't the kind of thing that happens much anymore.

I ain't wanting to build ships that blow up like that myself.

I used to work in the area that was the center of that explosion. Confused
[Image: M-Spr20-Weapons-FEATURED-1-1200x350-c-default.jpg]
Reply
#16

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 02:46 PM)Vivian Darkbloom Wrote:
(01-28-2019, 08:11 PM)abaris Wrote: Looks dramatic, but only 88 perished out of a crew of more than a thousand.

What a very odd thing to say.

In terms of naval combat, 88 casualties is a light loss for a sinking of that magnitude. Similar sentiments are expressed about USS Lexington and HMS Ark Royal, for instance.
On hiatus.
The following 2 users Like Thumpalumpacus's post:
  • abaris, Deesse23
Reply
#17

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 02:56 PM)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 04:48 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 03:16 AM)Minimalist Wrote: You have to admit that it isn't the kind of thing that happens much anymore.

I ain't wanting to build ships that blow up like that myself.

I used to work in the area that was the center of that explosion.  Confused

You were stationed on the Barham?!
On hiatus.
The following 3 users Like Thumpalumpacus's post:
  • Deesse23, Minimalist, Fireball
Reply
#18

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 02:52 PM)abaris Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 02:46 PM)Vivian Darkbloom Wrote: What a very odd thing to say.

If you look at the usual number of casualties in a naval battle of these days, very few lives were lost in comparison. In the second war, only three sailors survived the sinking of the Hood and a few days later, when british forces retaliated, only 123 survived the destruction of the Bismarck.


In the battle of Jutland ships simply exploded, killing nearly everyone. So yes, most of the crew surviving was pretty rare.

Yeah, yeah. Perhaps it would have seemed plenty "dramatic" if you'd been aboard, regardless of the number of survivors.
Step on the gas and wipe that tear away...
Reply
#19

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 03:09 PM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 02:56 PM)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 04:48 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I ain't wanting to build ships that blow up like that myself.

I used to work in the area that was the center of that explosion.  Confused

You were stationed on the Barham?!

Now you know what I'm fascinated with WWII, I was there. hobo
[Image: M-Spr20-Weapons-FEATURED-1-1200x350-c-default.jpg]
The following 2 users Like Gawdzilla Sama's post:
  • Thumpalumpacus, Fireball
Reply
#20

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 03:31 PM)Vivian Darkbloom Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 02:52 PM)abaris Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 02:46 PM)Vivian Darkbloom Wrote: What a very odd thing to say.

If you look at the usual number of casualties in a naval battle of these days, very few lives were lost in comparison. In the second war, only three sailors survived the sinking of the Hood and a few days later, when british forces retaliated, only 123 survived the destruction of the Bismarck.


In the battle of Jutland ships simply exploded, killing nearly everyone. So yes, most of the crew surviving was pretty rare.

Yeah, yeah. Perhaps it would have seemed plenty "dramatic" if you'd been aboard, regardless of the number of survivors.

I think it's obvious he was referencing the use of that footage in the media because of its dramatic visual impact with light losses, rather than belittling the drama those sailors experienced.
On hiatus.
The following 1 user Likes Thumpalumpacus's post:
  • abaris
Reply
#21

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 04:04 PM)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 03:09 PM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 02:56 PM)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: I used to work in the area that was the center of that explosion.  Confused

You were stationed on the Barham?!

Now you know what I'm fascinated with WWII, I was there.  hobo

Were't you also at the Battle of Gettysburg?   Big Grin

[Image: BC%202304_2_2a%20Lorin%20Andrews%20as%20...ropped.jpg]
                                                         T4618
The following 4 users Like Dancefortwo's post:
  • Thumpalumpacus, Chas, skyking, Bucky Ball
Reply
#22

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 05:13 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 04:04 PM)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(01-29-2019, 03:09 PM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You were stationed on the Barham?!

Now you know what I'm fascinated with WWII, I was there.  hobo

Were't you also at the Battle of Gettysburg?   Big Grin

[Image: BC%202304_2_2a%20Lorin%20Andrews%20as%20...ropped.jpg]

Not to mention Helm's Deep.

[Image: gimli.jpg]
On hiatus.
The following 4 users Like Thumpalumpacus's post:
  • Deesse23, Dancefortwo, Mathilda, skyking
Reply
#23

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
I was dwarfed by the giants of that bygone age.
[Image: M-Spr20-Weapons-FEATURED-1-1200x350-c-default.jpg]
The following 2 users Like Gawdzilla Sama's post:
  • Thumpalumpacus, Finite Monkeys
Reply
#24

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
(01-29-2019, 05:25 PM)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: I was dwarfed by the giants of that bygone age.

And you were still razorless, obviously.
On hiatus.
Reply
#25

Historical footage, often seen, but never in the right context
Does anyone else remember Z Z Topp?
Robert G. Ingersoll : “No man with a sense of humor ever founded a religion.”
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)