| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 25 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 22 Guest(s) Bing, Google
|
|
|
| Socialism/Communism is very stupid |
|
Posted by: Unsolicited Advisor - 07-17-2026, 08:29 AM - Forum: Philosophy and Ethics
- Replies (15)
|
 |
Socialism/Communism (same thing) is extremely dumb. The premise is that inequality is wrong. It's not. People aren't equal. Some are lazy, others are not. Those who are industrious and enterprising deserve everything they earn, and those who are not deserve poverty. I would feel sorry for an industrious person who falls on hard time, but I'd be perfectly happy to see a lazy person struggle because it's what they want.
There's some dipshit called Gary Stevenson who wants successful people to pay more tax. Why? So lazy people can benefit? Successful people already do more for society than the lazy. We provide products/services to people, they create all the jobs, they already pay more tax than everyone else put together, and they are an inspiration for the next generation of successful people to do the same.
You can't have equality by raising up the lazy. It won't work. The only way to do it is to bring down the successful.
Losers think that successful people sit around all day doing nothing while "the workers" create all the value. If that's true, maybe they should fuck off into the wilderness and create value there, without the infrastructure, resources, equipment and facilities to do so. Let's see how much value they manage to create then.
|
|
|
| Chatting with god |
|
Posted by: airportkid - 07-16-2026, 02:01 PM - Forum: Atheism & Theism
- Replies (22)
|
 |
Elsewhere in these threads a poster explained their prayers were chats with god in the same manner they would chat with another person. Chats are more informal than conversation or discussion but serve the same purpose: exchange of information. What on earth would you be able to tell a god that it doesn't already know?
You might explain that what you're really doing is getting a better grip on your own understanding and feelings rather than trying to tell an omniscient being something it doesn't know. OK, but you don't need a god for that.
What then is the point of one of these "chats"?
|
|
|
| What will happen to the N word? |
|
Posted by: Unsolicited Advisor - 07-16-2026, 08:37 AM - Forum: Off-topic
- Replies (47)
|
 |
The N word is a word that I'm not allowed to say. You might know what it is, or you might not. But either way, please don't ask me to tell you because I can't.
However, there is a group of people who are allowed to say the N word. Those are people we call blacks. Some call them negroes but I think that's outdated now so maybe we're not allowed to say it. Perhaps some day it will become another N word, and then no one will know whether someone means that N word or the other N word because no one will be allowed to say either of them.
After a couple more generations, what will happen to the N word (the original one, the naughty one)? Because no one will have said it for so long, people will start to wonder what it is. They may even start to wonder if they themselves have been saying it without realising it.
The blacks of course will continue using it and calling one another it, and everyone else will get to hear it. But after some years people might not realise that the N word they're using is the one no one else is allowed to use. And then of course everyone will start using it again, not knowing that it's the naughty N word.
Just a theory. What do you think will happen with the N word?
|
|
|
| Why do transexuals not like that term any more? |
|
Posted by: Unsolicited Advisor - 07-15-2026, 02:10 PM - Forum: Off-topic
- Replies (41)
|
 |
It's funny how transexuals nowadays prefer being called transgenders. It sounds so silly and makes no sense at all. Same with the use of the word gender at all. I was talking to one recently and he said that he's never liked it either. So obviously I'm not saying all of them, but a lot of them.
|
|
|
Florida's 10th Execution This Year |
|
Posted by: SYZ - 07-15-2026, 10:44 AM - Forum: World News, Politics and Current Events
- Replies (8)
|
 |
Florida put to death one of its oldest prisoners in its state history
on Tuesday, a 74-year-old convicted murderer who was one of three
older prisoners scheduled for execution within the span of a month
in the nation’s busiest death penalty state.
Dennis Sochor was pronounced dead at 6.16pm after a three-drug
injection at Florida state prison near Starke. He was convicted of
killing Patricia Gifford on 1 January 1982, just hours after meeting
the 18-year-old woman at a New Year’s Eve party.
![[Image: Screenshot-2026-07-15-at-20-15-33-Dennis...Search.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/J0jM86xy/Screenshot-2026-07-15-at-20-15-33-Dennis-Sochor-Google-Search.png)
Another 74-year-old prisoner, Dusty Ray Spencer, was put to death
last month. And later this month, the state is preparing to execute
an 80-year-old, Dominick Occhicone, the state’s first octogenarian
facing a lethal injection. Florida, has now carried out ten of the 16
executions conducted in the United States this year—more than all
the other states combined.
So... what's the worth to society either ethically or morally of executing
an 80-year-old criminal? Lawyers for Occhicone, who turns 81 next
month, say his planned execution is cruel and unusual punishment for
the near-incapacitated inmate. He's been on death row for forty years.
Governor Ron DeSantis signed both death warrants. Florida has seen
a surge in executions under DeSantis, carrying out 28 executions since
January last year. Six (I think?) of the 7 Florida Supreme Court justices
were appointed by DeSantis. Telling?
|
|
|
|