Is Morality Objective?

[Chas]

Your "axioms" are not objectively determined. 

Our urge to survive and thrive and not suffer can be objectively verified.

"Better" is individually determined, not objectively true.

What can be objectively individually determined to be true for a particular individual as a matter of fact *is* objectively true (just like the fact that I might have an allergy to a particular food but you might not and if I do and you don't then that fact can be objectively individually determined to be true as a matter of fact for me but not for you). You are confusing objective with universal or absolute. 

No, I am not.  You are misunderstanding what I have written.

Something can be relative or non-absolute and objective and something can be non-universal or individual and objective... the opposite of objective is subjective, not individual or relative.

Science is all relative and it's objective.

What is science relative to?

And whether everyone universally agrees on something or not doesn't make something objective. 

What makes something objective is that it is independently verifiable.

Again, to reiterate what I said earlier on the thread, the point of objectivity is that it means that something is true regardless of if everyone agrees or not.

What makes something objective is that it is independently verifiable.

 If Hitler won the war and everyone agreed with his immoral beliefs, that wouldn't make them correct. 

Nor does that make them incorrect or immoral.  While that is something largely agreed upon,  that doesn't make it objective.

And if no one in the world agreed with Hitler, that wouldn't make him wrong. Hitler is wrong regardless of whether anyone thinks that he is or isn't.

Says you.  There is no way to demonstrate that as an objective fact.

No, it's not.  A person in isolation has no morality or need for any.  It is only interaction with others that defines morality.

Perhaps you wouldn't call self-harm immoral... I disagree, however... altruism isn't the be-all-and-end-all of morality... and selflessness is just as much of a bias as selfishness is. There is no need to exclude our obligation to anyone and that includes ourselves (why wouldn't it?). Both egoism and altruism are biased... but a moral obligation to both self and others is not.

Once again, you have expressed your opinion on what is or isn't moral.  
You provide no basis that makes any of your judgments independently verifiable.