(11-20-2018, 01:15 AM)Chas Wrote: It is relative to culture. That makes it non-objective.
As explained, relative is not subjective and universal is not objective. The opposite of objective is subjective, the opposite of universal is non-universal and the opposite of relative is absolute.
As I've already explained: Science is both relative and epistemically objective, and the science of health is unique to individuals.
And there can be different scientific facts about different cultures.
Talking about morality being different across cultures and talking about the non-universality of morality is not addressing the question of whether morality is objective or subjective.
My Argument Against Free Will Wrote:(1) Ultimately, to control your actions you have to originate your original nature.
(2) But you can't originate your original nature—it's already there.
(3) So, ultimately, you can't control your actions.
