Is Morality Objective?

[EvieTheAvocado]

It is worth noting that some ethicists (such as Kant) view treating oneself poorly as a moral transgression. Therefore, morality doesn't depend upon a social dimension.

Just as I see it as a bias to exclude other species from moral concern (ethical speciesism is therefore wrong), and I see it as I bias to exclude others from moral concern (ethical egoism is therefore wrong), I likewise see it as a bias to exclude yourself from moral concern (ethical altruism is therefore wrong).

And, to be clear, I'm not saying that acting altruistically is wrong... I'm saying that the view that ethical altruism (the view that you only have a moral obligation to others and not to yourself) is wrong... for exactly the same reason that ethical egoism (the view that you only have a moral obligation to yourself) is wrong or ethical speciesism (the view that you only have an obligation to your own species) is wrong... that reason being that we have no justification for excluding any of those categories when all of them meet the same justification to include any of them.