Is Morality Objective?

[Thumpalumpacus]

My understanding extends to a guy named Charles Darwin had a theory for evolution and I've seen the monkey to man pictures. I have no background in genetic research. So I don't really know what I'm talking about.

Well, Darwin doesn't really address these issues. I'm no geneticist myself, but I've read enough about the subject to understand that while genes may be modified by radiation or chemical exposures, or simply inaccurate transcription inside the cell, those modifications don't encode experiences of the organism.
　

But I do know "chance" can also mean simply misunderstanding what happened.
As in the case of gender of offspring in horses from people who think it is a 50% chance.
　
I once saw a documentary on identical twin research looking at DNA to compare nature vs nurture. That showed the twins have exactly the same DNA but their genes develop differences so they had become different people. It referred to gene switches being turned on and turned off during their lifetime.

Yes, hox genes are facts, as are environmental factors. That doesn't mean that the individual's experience is being encoded as information.

So I'm thinking maybe when a switch is turned on or off that might give a specific direction for a mutation to go.
　
Like the genes of the Bajau people have adapted to their diving lifestyle. The people there who don't dive still have around 50% larger spleens than their undiving neighbours.

And whales and dolphins came out of the sea for a walk around on land and went back.

Yeah, no one is denying that evolution happens. I'm arguing that experiences aren't genetically encoded.