(11-10-2018, 08:32 AM)Chas Wrote:(11-10-2018, 07:11 AM)vulcanlogician Wrote: Biologists face a similar challenge when trying to classify different species. That doesn't mean that "species" isn't an objective determination. It just means there is vagueness involved.
Species does not even have an agreed upon definition in biology.
But let's stipulate that there are statistical grouping that we can generally agree to conveniently call species. How does this help us with the question of morality?
It doesn't.
Let's get back to the question of objective morality. Provide a basis for it as no one has done so yet.
How can morality be considered as objective if the survival of species is subjective? It can't.
But can morality for all of life be objective?
