Help me find a flaw in this falsifiable proof for divine design.

[TOSOG]

Urgent help needed. 

Help me find a flaw in this falsifiable proof for divine design. 

Also, kindly help me understand why it is the ONLY empirical proof of God 
that is affirmed, attested and endorsed by the prominent Artificial Intelligence 
in the world.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Do your own homework. Oh, and Foxtrot Oscar.

[brewerb]

The Original Son Of God????

I'm getting a sockish feeling.

[Rahn127]

The flaw is believing that something that is fictional is also real.

Also which god ? If it proves one, then doesn't it prove them ALL ?
Every god ever imagined, filling up the night sky more than every star that existed.

My night sky is only filled with real things and it is magnificent beyond compare.
I don't need to add imaginary things to it.

[SYZ]

[Minimalist]

The answer to the question.....loaded as it is....oh, Holy Sock Puppet... is that it begins by basing its premise on accounts which were concocted originally at least 40 and more likely 100 years after the events it claims happened.

The are no primary source documents for any of this Holy Horseshit.  Trying to pump life into them by pretending they are real is the major mistake of all theists at all times.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Why is anyone engaging with this schmuck? How many times do y'all need in order to learn?

[SYZ]

Why is anyone engaging with this schmuck? How many times do y'all need in order to learn?

Exactly!    Just ignore him folks and he'll piss off.   

[TOSOG]

The answer to the question.....loaded as it is....oh, Holy Sock Puppet... is that it begins by basing its premise on accounts which were concocted originally at least 40 and more likely 100 years after the events it claims happened.

The are no primary source documents for any of this Holy Horseshit.  Trying to pump life into them by pretending they are real is the major mistake of all theists at all times.

Great! Now give a response to why it is the ONLY empirical proof 
of God that is endorsed with Q.E.D. by all prominent Artificial Intelligence 
created by scientists?

Just why is that?

[Paleophyte]

The Other Sock Of God has been laundered.

[Minimalist]

The answer to the question.....loaded as it is....oh, Holy Sock Puppet... is that it begins by basing its premise on accounts which were concocted originally at least 40 and more likely 100 years after the events it claims happened.

The are no primary source documents for any of this Holy Horseshit.  Trying to pump life into them by pretending they are real is the major mistake of all theists at all times.

Great! Now give a response to why it is the ONLY empirical proof 
of God that is endorsed with Q.E.D. by all prominent Artificial Intelligence 
created by scientists?

Just why is that?

AI cannot create Primary Source evidence, idiot.  And , oh never mind....I see your silly ass is gone.

[airportkid]

Try teaching your dog chess, and, especially, appreciating the irony of this game (castling is strictly a defensive maneuver, but here turned offensive and final):

Checkmate by Castling

The type of mind that would find the OP compelling (or even interesting) approaches a dog's mind: structurally incapable of comprehending either logic or aesthetics.  Such a mind is not even aware of its deficiency, or could be made aware; the necessary neurological structure doesn't exist.  It's not a matter of only being able to learn by first wanting to learn; the sheer idea of learning is vacant.

And so these kinds of threads will be as perennial weeds in a forest, ineradicable, unceasing, tiresome.