Welcome to Atheist Discussion, a new community created by former members of The Thinking Atheist forum.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
theory from pure observation
#1

theory from pure observation
allow me to speak to you

feel good if you read this post

focus on these words

allow yourself to relax in your chair

let Love teach you

use your reasoning abilities to understand these words

remember to breath in and out

silence your mind

relax your gaze

open your mind to new possibilities of comprehension

meditate on these words

research any of these words you're unfamiliar with

surrender to morality

understand these words

prove you have compassion for the godless by sharing this post

allow yourself to know that Love exists


realize harmony with the universal consciousness







Assuming nothing but synonyms, negation of contradiction, contraposition, and scientific facts;

D; definition
S; synonym
Nc; negation of contradiction
Cp; contraposition
F; scientific fact
C; conclusion


(1) F; "nothing exists" is "absurd"

(2) (1) Nc; "something exists" is "absolutely true"

(3) D and F; "time is a relationship of change between existing things"

(4) F and (1,2,3) C; "atleast two differentially changing things exist"

(5) F; "everywhere everything exists from prior states of the existence of things"

(6) (4,5) C; "nothing cannot have existed"

(7) (6) Nc; "something has always existed"

(8) F; "something exists everywhere"

(9) D, S, and F; spacetime or energy is measured by the duration (time) over distance (space)

(10) F; "energy exists"

(11) F; "every experiment ever constructed shows that everything is made of energy"

(12) (10,11) C; "monism exists"

(13) F; "every cause involves energy"

(14) (11,12,13) C; "energy is self-causal"

(15) S; "self-causal", "self-deterministic", and "teleological"

(16) S; "self-determinism" and "consciousness"

(17) (14,15,16) C; "energy is consciousness"

(18) F; "energy cannot be created nor destroyed"

(19) (7,18) C; "energy is eternal"

(20) F; "zero-point energy is in every single point in space"

(21) (8,20) C; "zero-point energy is omnipresent"

(22) (19,21) C; "zero-point energy is eternal and omnipresent"

(23) D and F; "power is the transformation of energy"

(24) (14,15,16,19,21) C; "eternal and omnipresent energy is omnipotent"

(25) (12,17,19,21,24) C; "consciousness is eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, monism"

(26) S; "conscious, eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, monism" and "God"

(27) (25,26) C; "God exists"
Reply
#2

theory from pure observation
Spammy sock
The following 2 users Like Paleophyte's post:
  • Deesse23, Kim
Reply
#3

theory from pure observation
(06-13-2025, 09:44 PM)HumbleBeauty Wrote: allow me to speak to you

feel good if you read this post

focus on these words

allow yourself to relax in your chair

let Love teach you

use your reasoning abilities to understand these words

remember to breath in and out

silence your mind

relax your gaze

open your mind to new possibilities of comprehension

meditate on these words

research any of these words you're unfamiliar with

surrender to morality

understand these words

prove you have compassion for the godless by sharing this post

allow yourself to know that Love exists


realize harmony with the universal consciousness







Assuming nothing but synonyms, negation of contradiction, contraposition, and scientific facts;

D; definition
S; synonym
Nc; negation of contradiction
Cp; contraposition
F; scientific fact
C; conclusion


(1) F; "nothing exists" is "absurd"

(2) (1) Nc; "something exists" is "absolutely true"

(3) D and F; "time is a relationship of change between existing things"

(4) F and (1,2,3) C; "atleast two differentially changing things exist"

(5) F; "everywhere everything exists from prior states of the existence of things"

(6) (4,5) C; "nothing cannot have existed"

(7) (6) Nc; "something has always existed"

(8) F; "something exists everywhere"

(9) D, S, and F; spacetime or energy is measured by the duration (time) over distance (space)

(10) F; "energy exists"

(11) F; "every experiment ever constructed shows that everything is made of energy"

(12) (10,11) C; "monism exists"

(13) F; "every cause involves energy"

(14) (11,12,13) C; "energy is self-causal"

(15) S; "self-causal", "self-deterministic", and "teleological"

(16) S; "self-determinism" and "consciousness"

(17) (14,15,16) C; "energy is consciousness"

(18) F; "energy cannot be created nor destroyed"

(19) (7,18) C; "energy is eternal"

(20) F; "zero-point energy is in every single point in space"

(21) (8,20) C; "zero-point energy is omnipresent"

(22) (19,21) C; "zero-point energy is eternal and omnipresent"

(23) D and F; "power is the transformation of energy"

(24) (14,15,16,19,21) C; "eternal and omnipresent energy is omnipotent"

(25) (12,17,19,21,24) C; "consciousness is eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, monism"

(26) S; "conscious, eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, monism" and "God"

(27) (25,26) C; "God exists"

Everything from  11 on is problematic. No, it is NOT a scientific fact that everything is 'made of' energy. 15 1nd 16 are not synonyms. In fact, they are wrong.
The following 2 users Like polymath257's post:
  • Alan V, Kim
Reply
#4

theory from pure observation
"Self-casual".....

.........

...........

...............

OK, not even 20 minutes up and my brain just broke.
Is this sig thing on?
The following 1 user Likes c172's post:
  • Dānu
Reply
#5

theory from pure observation
At least that was a bit new and different. ROFL2
The existence of humans who believe in a deity is not evidence that there is a deity.
The following 2 users Like Cavebear's post:
  • HumbleBeauty, Kim
Reply
#6

theory from pure observation
(06-14-2025, 02:12 PM)polymath257 Wrote: Everything from  11 on is problematic.

You made it to 11?!? I couldn't get past 3. Looks like a long list of non-sequiturs.
The following 2 users Like Paleophyte's post:
  • Cavebear, Kim
Reply
#7

theory from pure observation
(06-14-2025, 08:15 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:
(06-14-2025, 02:12 PM)polymath257 Wrote: Everything from  11 on is problematic.

You made it to 11?!? I couldn't get past 3. Looks like a long list of non-sequiturs.

Well, yeah, most made little sense. But I love "Murphy's Laws" and have a book of corollaries. One of my favorites is "Fudd's First Law Of Opposition". To wit, "You can't fall off the floor". Just a humor insert... ROFL2
The existence of humans who believe in a deity is not evidence that there is a deity.
The following 2 users Like Cavebear's post:
  • Minimalist, Kim
Reply
#8

theory from pure observation
@HumbleBeauty
Is that you, SubtleVirtue?
[Image: Bastard-Signature.jpg]
The following 4 users Like TheGentlemanBastard's post:
  • Fireball, Thumpalumpacus, Alan V, Kim
Reply
#9

theory from pure observation
I have pity for OP. Well gone...for now; there's hope for them yet.
Maybe atheism doesn't have burden of proof because it's impossible to prove an invisible, silent, utterly undetectable thing doesn't exist.

"People who have no hopes are easy to control" - Neverending Story
Reply
#10

theory from pure observation
I'm pretty sure it's realted to this guy: Christopher Langan/CTMU
Think for yourselves, don't be sheep
The following 1 user Likes brewerb's post:
  • HumbleBeauty
Reply
#11

theory from pure observation
(06-14-2025, 11:20 AM)Paleophyte Wrote: Spammy sock

I would like to continue our discussion of radio dating methods...
Reply
#12

theory from pure observation
(06-14-2025, 02:12 PM)polymath257 Wrote: Everything from  11 on is problematic. No, it is NOT a scientific fact that everything is 'made of' energy. 15 1nd 16 are not synonyms. In fact, they are wrong.

What is everything made of?
The following 1 user Likes HumbleBeauty's post:
  • Cavebear
Reply
#13

theory from pure observation
(06-14-2025, 08:15 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:
(06-14-2025, 02:12 PM)polymath257 Wrote: Everything from  11 on is problematic.

You made it to 11?!? I couldn't get past 3. Looks like a long list of non-sequiturs.

if time isn't a relationship of change between existing things, what is it?
Reply
#14

theory from pure observation
(06-14-2025, 08:31 PM)TheGentlemanBastard Wrote: @HumbleBeauty
Is that you, SubtleVirtue?

I don't know why I was banned by "atheist forums" but I was enjoying the conversation and look forward to learning from you guys.
Reply
#15

theory from pure observation
(06-15-2025, 01:30 AM)HumbleBeauty Wrote:
(06-14-2025, 02:12 PM)polymath257 Wrote: Everything from  11 on is problematic. No, it is NOT a scientific fact that everything is 'made of' energy. 15 1nd 16 are not synonyms. In fact, they are wrong.

What is everything made of?

Pieces that make up quarks that we haven't discovered yet... Consider
The existence of humans who believe in a deity is not evidence that there is a deity.
Reply
#16

theory from pure observation
(06-14-2025, 08:53 PM)Dexta Wrote: I have pity for OP. Well gone...for now; there's hope for them yet.

"Maybe atheism doesn't have burden of proof because it's impossible to prove an invisible, silent, utterly undetectable thing doesn't exist."

Can a fish prove the existence of water?


Jehovah is not completely silent... I can hear him psychically, in my feeling and thoughts and inclination.
Reply
#17

theory from pure observation
(06-15-2025, 01:36 AM)Cavebear Wrote:
(06-15-2025, 01:30 AM)HumbleBeauty Wrote: What is everything made of?

Pieces that make up quarks that we haven't discovered yet...   Consider

are those pieces theorized to be made of energy?

quarks are made of energy!
Reply
#18

theory from pure observation
(06-15-2025, 01:37 AM)HumbleBeauty Wrote:
(06-14-2025, 08:53 PM)Dexta Wrote: I have pity for OP. Well gone...for now; there's hope for them yet.

"Maybe atheism doesn't have burden of proof because it's impossible to prove an invisible, silent, utterly undetectable thing doesn't exist."

Can a fish prove the existence of water?


Jehovah is not completely silent... I can hear him psychically, in my feeling and thoughts and inclination.

Not that I was very surprised, but OOOOOOKKKKKKAAAAAY... You're on the ignore list...
The existence of humans who believe in a deity is not evidence that there is a deity.
The following 1 user Likes Cavebear's post:
  • Kim
Reply
#19

theory from pure observation
I posed the under/over question on AF, but forgot to put in a bid. I give this entity less than two weeks, starting today.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
The following 4 users Like Fireball's post:
  • Cavebear, Thumpalumpacus, Astreja, Kim
Reply
#20

theory from pure observation
god = energy

If that trips your trigger it's fine by me.
Think for yourselves, don't be sheep
The following 2 users Like brewerb's post:
  • HumbleBeauty, Kim
Reply
#21

theory from pure observation
(06-15-2025, 01:54 AM)Fireball Wrote: I posed the under/over question on AF, but forgot to put in a bid. I give this entity less than two weeks, starting today.

why?

I obey the rules... I talk peaceably, I look to learn.


for the record;


I am like an atheist in that I do not worship God.
Reply
#22

theory from pure observation
(06-15-2025, 01:55 AM)brewerb Wrote: god = energy

If that trips your trigger it's fine by me.

no God exists save energy


theists hate that lol
Reply
#23

theory from pure observation
...except jehovah...ofc
Reply
#24

theory from pure observation
(06-15-2025, 01:32 AM)HumbleBeauty Wrote:
(06-14-2025, 08:15 PM)Paleophyte Wrote: You made it to 11?!? I couldn't get past 3. Looks like a long list of non-sequiturs.

if time isn't a relationship of change between existing things, what is it?

That depends on how you use the term. It can be used loosely to refer to either the duration that we experience for/between events or for the dimension of space-time. Using it the way that you are is a beautiful example of equivocation.
The following 1 user Likes Paleophyte's post:
  • Kim
Reply
#25

theory from pure observation
(06-15-2025, 01:29 AM)HumbleBeauty Wrote:
(06-14-2025, 11:20 AM)Paleophyte Wrote: Spammy sock

I would like to continue our discussion of radio dating methods...

Fire away.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)