10-22-2024, 02:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-22-2024, 02:40 PM by mordant.)
"I was just praying!"
"I was just praying!"
As I mentioned some time ago, someone or something put me on Christianity Today's mailing list and I get a daily summary of articles they are publishing. Occasionally I see something that catches my interest.
Today the headline was "UK Christian Guilty in Buffer Zone Prayer Case".
The gist of it is that the UK has buffer zones around abortion clinics as there has been violence, intimidation of patients, and other issues. People may peacefully protest outside of them, but not within them.
One has to consider the source when reading of such things, so I poked around with Google. The story, predictably, was picked up by Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), Focus on the Family, and other right wing / mostly fundamentalist Christian groups with headlines like "All I Did Was Pray to God: Christian Man Convicted For Praying Silently Outside Abortion Clinic".
Finally I found a primary source citation: the BBC. And with the BBC's relatively less biased and alarmist reporting (headline: "Praying man breached abortion clinic safe zone"), the actual facts, as I suspected, were:
1) He was praying well inside the buffer zone.
2) He was asked to leave.
3) He refused, despite an HOUR AND FORTY MINUTES of gentle persuasion (and of course now claims he did not refuse to leave)
He was given a conditional two year discharge and ordered to pay more than £9,000 in court costs. The judge said his actions were "deliberate". If he repeat offends within 2 years he will do jail time.
There's some evidence he had been informing authorities of his actions ahead of time on many occasions and so probably fishing for a confrontation.
So here we have a Christian probing the boundaries of what can be got away with in breaching the "safe zone" and, as the saying goes, he "fucked around and found out".
It is not that there's necessarily something inherently wrong with that, provided he accepts the consequences of his actions. It is perfectly fine to protest abortion at a safe distance, and he was probably trying to see if silent prayer would be let slide, if THAT was considered protest ... and if THAT were let slide, doubtless, trying to strike up conversations with patients or staff coming and going, etc ("Hey, I was just saying hi and being friendly!"). This is all at least arguably supported as the right to protest and a tactical exploration of the exact limits of the law.
But no. He has to play the martyr and he has to be lionized as a martyr by Christian media and organizations and it has to be turned into "the state is persecuting us for our faith, waaahhh!"
I am really getting fed up with the martyr complex of these extremists. It is very much like unwanted proselytization, only far worse ... intimidating and guilting / shaming young girls seeking these services is, by their lights, fine if it's in the name of God. And these particular protestors have a history of escalation to physical threat. After all if you're convinced like this guy that he has to avenge his child who was aborted 20 years ago, you might well stop at nothing including physical confrontation.
Fine and dandy ... do what your conscience tells you to do, but then accept the consequences and don't try to turn it into a claim of persecution and violation of fundamental liberties, and some sort of de facto right to intimidate, harass, threaten and bully people into your beliefs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g9kp7r00vo
Today the headline was "UK Christian Guilty in Buffer Zone Prayer Case".
The gist of it is that the UK has buffer zones around abortion clinics as there has been violence, intimidation of patients, and other issues. People may peacefully protest outside of them, but not within them.
One has to consider the source when reading of such things, so I poked around with Google. The story, predictably, was picked up by Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), Focus on the Family, and other right wing / mostly fundamentalist Christian groups with headlines like "All I Did Was Pray to God: Christian Man Convicted For Praying Silently Outside Abortion Clinic".
Finally I found a primary source citation: the BBC. And with the BBC's relatively less biased and alarmist reporting (headline: "Praying man breached abortion clinic safe zone"), the actual facts, as I suspected, were:
1) He was praying well inside the buffer zone.
2) He was asked to leave.
3) He refused, despite an HOUR AND FORTY MINUTES of gentle persuasion (and of course now claims he did not refuse to leave)
He was given a conditional two year discharge and ordered to pay more than £9,000 in court costs. The judge said his actions were "deliberate". If he repeat offends within 2 years he will do jail time.
There's some evidence he had been informing authorities of his actions ahead of time on many occasions and so probably fishing for a confrontation.
So here we have a Christian probing the boundaries of what can be got away with in breaching the "safe zone" and, as the saying goes, he "fucked around and found out".
It is not that there's necessarily something inherently wrong with that, provided he accepts the consequences of his actions. It is perfectly fine to protest abortion at a safe distance, and he was probably trying to see if silent prayer would be let slide, if THAT was considered protest ... and if THAT were let slide, doubtless, trying to strike up conversations with patients or staff coming and going, etc ("Hey, I was just saying hi and being friendly!"). This is all at least arguably supported as the right to protest and a tactical exploration of the exact limits of the law.
But no. He has to play the martyr and he has to be lionized as a martyr by Christian media and organizations and it has to be turned into "the state is persecuting us for our faith, waaahhh!"
I am really getting fed up with the martyr complex of these extremists. It is very much like unwanted proselytization, only far worse ... intimidating and guilting / shaming young girls seeking these services is, by their lights, fine if it's in the name of God. And these particular protestors have a history of escalation to physical threat. After all if you're convinced like this guy that he has to avenge his child who was aborted 20 years ago, you might well stop at nothing including physical confrontation.
Fine and dandy ... do what your conscience tells you to do, but then accept the consequences and don't try to turn it into a claim of persecution and violation of fundamental liberties, and some sort of de facto right to intimidate, harass, threaten and bully people into your beliefs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g9kp7r00vo