Welcome to Atheist Discussion, a new community created by former members of The Thinking Atheist forum.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Oh, and fuck
#1

Oh, and fuck
Quote:Scientists in the 1970s at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) created a method to determine when the fall of society would take place. That method indicated the fall will be some point near the middle in the 21st century around 2040, and so far, their projections have been on track, new analysis suggests.

Reply
#2

Oh, and fuck
So long as I get my flying cars and teleporters before then, I'm good.
On hiatus.
The following 2 users Like Thumpalumpacus's post:
  • Fireball, LastPoet
Reply
#3

Oh, and fuck
I should be dead.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#4

Oh, and fuck
Me, too.
  • “The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.” ― H.L. Mencken, 1922
Reply
#5

Oh, and fuck
The following 1 user Likes jerry mcmasters's post:
  • Inkubus
Reply
#6

Oh, and fuck
Eh. Mankind is just too damned stubborn a beast to go quietly into the night. We'll persist, but I'm not sure that I'll like the place when it happens.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
The following 1 user Likes Fireball's post:
  • Cavebear
Reply
#7

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 02:20 AM)Fireball Wrote: Eh. Mankind is just too damned stubborn a beast to go quietly into the night. We'll persist, but I'm not sure that I'll like the place when it happens.

Thankfully, someone invented shotguns. I'll stay on while I can.

Perfectly honest, I'm more worried about my body than these putzes around us.
On hiatus.
Reply
#8

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 02:20 AM)Fireball Wrote: Eh. Mankind is just too damned stubborn a beast to go quietly into the night. We'll persist, but I'm not sure that I'll like the place when it happens.

When the asteroid hit the Earth 65 million years ago, it killed most every land and air mammal over 1 kilo. We are larger than that. We would "probably" die off should a similar event happen.
You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game!
Reply
#9

Oh, and fuck
Meh, I'd be 80. Nobody on dad's side lived that long. My GAF will be just about worn out by then, if not my vessel itself.
test signature
Reply
#10

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 12:20 AM)Inkubus Wrote: Scientists in the 1970s at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) created a method to determine when the fall of society would take place. That method indicated the fall will be some point near the middle in the 21st century around 2040, and so far, their projections have been on track, new analysis suggests...

I'm afraid I couldn't persevere with the linked video...

The robotic voice-over was astoundingly irritating.  
The only thing I could hear after 5 minutes was the
over-enunciation of the last syllable generated before
each period.

        Angry
I'm a creationist;   I believe that man created God.
Reply
#11

Oh, and fuck
I read The Limits of Growth back in the 1970s, and several of its follow-up books some years later. I was impressed at first, but not so much now. Too much has changed, as I will explain.

Population decline is generally a good thing. Our present populations are unsustainable into the future.

If you worry about the decrease in productivity caused by population numbers going down, you should rest assured that computers and AI can compensate to a large extent. However with immigration, we will not run out of able workers for a long time yet.

If you worry about fossil fuels running out, just remember that we will have to transition away from them long before they run out to avoid the worst of climate change. We are already working in that direction.

If you worry about society collapsing, you have to define which society you are talking about. Certain countries are already collapsing. Others are doing very well indeed. I am sometimes surprised that Americans and Europeans can worry about such things when, relatively speaking, we have almost never had it better.

We are now knowledge-rich, so I don't foresee any problems we can't tackle, climate change included. Yes, we will have to adapt as well as mitigate, but that has been the case for some time now.

The fact that life is never easy doesn't mean we are all doomed. We old people may be sidelined, but young people usually have the energy to tackle big problems.

If all of the above sounds like a survival-of-the-rich scenario, it may well be. With our progress, we have created many new cultural-evolutionary pressures. We have not yet escaped our history of the strong taking advantage of the weak and then leaving them behind. So humanity will always survive in some form, since so many of us are opportunists.
The following 1 user Likes Alan V's post:
  • Thumpalumpacus
Reply
#12

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 06:37 PM)Alan V Wrote: I read The Limits of Growth back in the 1970s, and several of its follow-up books some years later.  I was impressed at first, but not so much now.  Too much has changed, as I will explain.

Population decline is generally a good thing.  Our present populations are unsustainable into the future.

If you worry about the decrease in productivity caused by population numbers going down, you should rest assured that computers and AI can compensate to a large extent.  However with immigration, we will not run out of able workers for a long time yet.

If you worry about fossil fuels running out, just remember that we will have to transition away from them long before they run out to avoid the worst of climate change.  We are already working in that direction.

If you worry about society collapsing, you have to define which society you are talking about.  Certain countries are already collapsing.  Others are doing very well indeed.  I am sometimes surprised that Americans and Europeans can worry about such things when, relatively speaking, we have almost never had it better.  

We are now knowledge-rich, so I don't foresee any problems we can't tackle, climate change included.  Yes, we will have to adapt as well as mitigate, but that has been the case for some time now.

The fact that life is never easy doesn't mean we are all doomed.  We old people may be sidelined, but young people usually have the energy to tackle big problems.

If all of the above sounds like a survival-of-the-rich scenario, it may well be.  With our progress, we have created many new cultural-evolutionary pressures.  We have not yet escaped our history of the strong taking advantage of the weak and then leaving them behind.  So humanity will always survive in some form, since so many of us are opportunists.

Contrived naivety.

Alan, are you and Rhythmcs in competition? Did either of you actually watch the thing?

Here it is again. Watch, Listen and Learn:

Reply
#13

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 03:18 PM)SYZ Wrote:
(08-20-2024, 12:20 AM)Inkubus Wrote: Scientists in the 1970s at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) created a method to determine when the fall of society would take place. That method indicated the fall will be some point near the middle in the 21st century around 2040, and so far, their projections have been on track, new analysis suggests...

I'm afraid I couldn't persevere with the linked video...

The robotic voice-over was astoundingly irritating.  
The only thing I could hear after 5 minutes was the
over-enunciation of the last syllable generated before
each period.

        Angry

Oh for fuck sake! Yes it's awful. SYZ I'm sorry man. I posted the wrong one but I don't know how, I always use preview to double check. 

I hate getting links wrong.
The following 1 user Likes Inkubus's post:
  • SYZ
Reply
#14

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 08:10 PM)Inkubus Wrote: Contrived naivety.

Alan, are you and Rhythmcs in competition? Did either of you actually watch the thing?

Here it is again. Watch, Listen and Learn:

Believe whatever you like, but the "how civilizations end" discussion strikes me as so much nonsense.  To me the guy is just another the-sky-is-falling scholarly type, when in fact he only grasps one part of a much bigger and more complex problem.

Edit to add: That video was from a different discussion, not this one. So mentioning it in this context was really a kind of bait and switch as far as topics go. I was responding to the video in your OP. I wanted to address what I considered a serious topic.

My mistake. Again.
The following 2 users Like Alan V's post:
  • Edible crust, Thumpalumpacus
Reply
#15

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 08:31 PM)Inkubus Wrote:
(08-20-2024, 03:18 PM)SYZ Wrote: I'm afraid I couldn't persevere with the linked video...

The robotic voice-over was astoundingly irritating.  
The only thing I could hear after 5 minutes was the
over-enunciation of the last syllable generated before
each period.

        Angry

Oh for fuck sake! Yes it's awful. SYZ I'm sorry man. I posted the wrong one but I don't know how, I always use preview to double check. 

I hate getting links wrong.

No problems my friend.     Smile

Thank you for posting it for others, at least!
I'm a creationist;   I believe that man created God.
Reply
#16

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 12:54 AM)brewerb Wrote: I should be dead.

I've got only three or four years left anyway, so I don't give a hoot.  Cranky
“I expect to pass this way but once; any good therefore that I can do, or any kindness that I can show to any fellow creature, let me do it now. Let me not defer or neglect it, for I shall not pass this way again.” (Etienne De Grellet)
The following 1 user Likes Gwaithmir's post:
  • Edible crust
Reply
#17

Oh, and fuck
(08-20-2024, 08:10 PM)Inkubus Wrote:
I don't believe this guy's assertion that women have been treated "cruelly" for wanting to have children. My daughter had 5 of the little buggers and that's her choice / right, and none of my business. I have not seen her being persecuted for it. Au contraire, her husband's mother is wealthy and has showered the family with largesse. She loves playing "fun grandma".

That women don't feel obligated to the patriarchy anymore to be perpetually barefoot and pregnant has been liberating for them. Nothing about that prevents a woman from voluntarily choosing to have a big family. Most women are just saner than my daughter, lol.

I have never seen low birth rates as the way to environmental sustainability. We are way past the point of resource overshoot anyway. I have never seen high birth rates as anything but a self limiting problem. When there's no $$ and no resources, people either quit having children, or the kids die. In any case, wherever the standard of living has been decent, which includes higher education, that naturally suppresses birth rates.

The real problem is unbridled capitalism and its need for constant growth at all costs.

The guy is right that there's no easy way out of this, but what I think he's overlooking is that we're not entitled to live in the lap of Western luxury either. With good leadership (ha!) there'd probably be a path to preserving basic health care and comm technology, but falling back to a lifestyle with far less travel / commuting, more locally sustainable farming and way less factory farming and the like.
The following 2 users Like mordant's post:
  • LastPoet, Rhythmcs
Reply
#18

Oh, and fuck
I wouldn't care if i stayed with masturbation my whole life. Alas, i somehow brought newer life to this shithole. You might feel sorry for these words, but i feel fantastic, to teach my daughter maths  and physics. She, by her mother goes catholic. I will always love her as i love the universe, with all.
While i like to pretend to know quantum mechanics, i greatly fail. That shit goes too deep.
Reply
#19

Oh, and fuck
There has been various stigmas on women for having large families and for single women having any children, much less more than one. It varies and the large family stigma isn’t very strong…unless the woman’s single.

Large families with wealth or access to grandmas money are treated very differently from the poor family with many children and they’re just barely scraping by. Just as a wealthy single woman with a child doesn’t face near the stigma of a poor one. So, it’s not always overt but it’s often there.

The pill and no fault divorce changed women’s choices by a landslide…and many men are pissed about it. Losing their ability to keep the wife at home bearing him children while he has some koochie on the side just isn’t tolerated anymore…not to mention the violent husbands. Some men are also pissed that their wives have to work outside the home. The male doesn’t make enough to “keep her happy” and she has opportunities to meet other men and women gaining a new view of her options. Of course this isn’t all men. It’s actually unusual amongst Democrats but much more common in the religious communities. Being as so many religious are Republicans, they are naturally looking at outlawing the pill and doing away with no fault divorce. They want the white 1950’s back. They’re never going to get it again. But, they’ll scream and pout and make a ton of noise anyway.
The following 1 user Likes pattylt's post:
  • mordant
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)