Welcome to Atheist Discussion, a new community created by former members of The Thinking Atheist forum.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Crucifixion argument....
#76

Crucifixion argument....
Sorry, I hit the button too soon.
The following 1 user Likes Dancefortwo's post:
  • GenesisNemesis
Reply
#77

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 10:23 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 10:10 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: Who the hell are you...
 

https://atheistdiscussion.org/forums/sho...#pid296764

Quote: and why are you capitalizing the "H" in him and the "C" in crucifixion?  
 

Deferential reverence when referring to His Crucifixion.

Quote:Do you think that capitalizing those particular words makes the bible true?

Yes.
That's my working theory.
Upper Case Epistemics.
Italicised words are ontologically valid...
FONT SIZE trumps appeal to authority.
Bold CAPS lock beats argumentum ad populam....etc etc
You get the idea.



(05-07-2021, 10:23 PM)Lion IRC Wrote: Diferential reverence when referring to His Crucifixion.

Bahahahahaha!  Utter rubbish.  

Odin, the God of all Gods, Promised to killed all the Ice Giants.  You don't see Ice Giants around any more, do you?   Proof that Odin is the God of all Gods.  Furthermore, He is the Strongest and most Powerful.   

Capital "H" in He, capital "S" in Strongest and capital "P" in Powerful because deferential reverance to Odin for killing all the Ice Giants makes it real and true.......or should I say ..."Real and True".
                                                         T4618
Reply
#78

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 10:23 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 10:10 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: Who the hell are you...
 

https://atheistdiscussion.org/forums/sho...#pid296764

Quote: and why are you capitalizing the "H" in him and the "C" in crucifixion?  
 

Deferential reverence when referring to His Crucifixion.

Quote:Do you think that capitalizing those particular words makes the bible true?



Yes.
That's my working theory.
Upper Case Epistemics.
Italicised words are ontologically valid...
FONT SIZE trumps appeal to authority.
Bold CAPS lock beats argumentum ad populam....etc etc
You get the idea.

It's real easy to tell what your intentions are. Didn't even make an introductory post and you're already getting cocky with people here.
Sometimes you just have no words all you can do is laugh at the stupidity. Deadpan Coffee Drinker
The following 1 user Likes GenesisNemesis's post:
  • Szuchow
Reply
#79

Crucifixion argument....
Dancefortwo Wrote:...Odin is the God of all Gods.  Furthermore, He is the Strongest and most Powerful.

When someone says Odin, I know who they really mean.
Reply
#80

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 11:10 PM)GenesisNemesis Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 10:23 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 10:10 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: Who the hell are you...
 

https://atheistdiscussion.org/forums/sho...#pid296764

Quote: and why are you capitalizing the "H" in him and the "C" in crucifixion?  
 

Deferential reverence when referring to His Crucifixion.

Quote:Do you think that capitalizing those particular words makes the bible true?



Yes.
That's my working theory.
Upper Case Epistemics.
Italicised words are ontologically valid...
FONT SIZE trumps appeal to authority.
Bold CAPS lock beats argumentum ad populam....etc etc
You get the idea.

It's real easy to tell what your intentions are. Didn't even make an introductory post and you're already getting cocky with people here.


WUT???
You included a link to my introduction thread in your post.
Reply
#81

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 11:13 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
Dancefortwo Wrote:...Odin is the God of all Gods.  Furthermore, He is the Strongest and most Powerful.

When someone says Odin, I know who they really mean.

Me, too.

[Image: 27c732118b0f51ad88dbcf6c54496d2c.jpg]
Robert G. Ingersoll : “No man with a sense of humor ever founded a religion.”
The following 2 users Like Minimalist's post:
  • Dancefortwo, Astreja
Reply
#82

Crucifixion argument....
GenesisNemesis 
Oh look, it's Lion. 

I know of them from TalkFreethought. Anyway, his only goal is to convert atheists to Christianity, and he makes a lot of really dumb arguments, none of which should be at all surprising to atheists who are knowledgable in this area.  [color=#cc3333' Wrote:
Do with him what you will[/color].  Deadpan Coffee Drinker

Please don't ban this most entertaining troll. He's been at it for years. And things usually end up...>

[Image: JEt5M3CeRAj0986oIu2KWJB4QmYD9Zx4jnDSB5UF...GW_TRrZgJY]

We have to let it linger, some fine sport will ensure.
The following 1 user Likes Inkubus's post:
  • GenesisNemesis
Reply
#83

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 11:13 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
Dancefortwo Wrote:...Odin is the God of all Gods.  Furthermore, He is the Strongest and most Powerful.

When someone says Odin, I know who they really mean.

He's the God of all Gods.  Prove me wrong.
                                                         T4618
The following 2 users Like Dancefortwo's post:
  • GenesisNemesis, Szuchow
Reply
#84

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 12:05 AM)Inkubus Wrote:
GenesisNemesis 
Oh look, it's Lion. 

I know of them from TalkFreethought. Anyway, his only goal is to convert atheists to Christianity, and he makes a lot of really dumb arguments, none of which should be at all surprising to atheists who are knowledgable in this area.  [color=#cc3333' Wrote:
Do with him what you will[/color].  Deadpan Coffee Drinker

Please don't ban this most entertaining troll. He's been at it for years. And things usually end up...>

[Image: JEt5M3CeRAj0986oIu2KWJB4QmYD9Zx4jnDSB5UF...GW_TRrZgJY]

We have to let it linger, some fine sport will ensure.

I know, I'm having a field day with this new chew toy.   Smile
                                                         T4618
Reply
#85

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 11:13 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
Dancefortwo Wrote:...Odin is the God of all Gods.  Furthermore, He is the Strongest and most Powerful.

When someone says Odin, I know who they really mean.

See? He's already talking down to us. I wonder why people don't find you so convincing.
Sometimes you just have no words all you can do is laugh at the stupidity. Deadpan Coffee Drinker
Reply
#86

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 12:42 AM)GenesisNemesis Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 11:13 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
Dancefortwo Wrote:...Odin is the God of all Gods.  Furthermore, He is the Strongest and most Powerful.

When someone says Odin, I know who they really mean.

See? He's already talking down to us. I wonder why people don't find you so convincing.

They never took him seriously. He was the runt theist on TTA.
The following 2 users Like Bucky Ball's post:
  • GenesisNemesis, Szuchow
Reply
#87

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 11:18 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 11:10 PM)GenesisNemesis Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 10:23 PM)Lion IRC Wrote:  

https://atheistdiscussion.org/forums/sho...#pid296764

 

Deferential reverence when referring to His Crucifixion.




Yes.
That's my working theory.
Upper Case Epistemics.
Italicised words are ontologically valid...
FONT SIZE trumps appeal to authority.
Bold CAPS lock beats argumentum ad populam....etc etc
You get the idea.

It's real easy to tell what your intentions are. Didn't even make an introductory post and you're already getting cocky with people here.


WUT???
You included a link to my introduction thread in your post.

Makes about as much sense as the Bible, doesn't it? Deadpan Coffee Drinker
Sometimes you just have no words all you can do is laugh at the stupidity. Deadpan Coffee Drinker
Reply
#88

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 12:39 AM)Dancefortwo Wrote: He's the God of all Gods.  Prove me wrong.

You used upper case G.
I know Who you mean.  Thumbs Up
Reply
#89

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 03:46 AM)Lion IRC Wrote:
(05-08-2021, 12:39 AM)Dancefortwo Wrote: He's the God of all Gods.  Prove me wrong.

You used upper case G.
I know Who you mean.  Thumbs Up

Well, of course you know who I'm talking about, I'm talking about the REAL God,  ODIN. And I typed it in capital letters too, so of course this makes it truer than if I had typed it in lower case.  Your god, you sad little snowflake, created evil. Your deity even says so in your old musty book.  Isaiah 47: 7  "I......created evil".   Your mythical, genocidal biblical god kills 24 million people because he can't figure out how to forgive people without murdering them. His nemisis only kills 10.... total.  

Too bad for you, you pathetic little empty flower pot.
                                                         T4618
The following 1 user Likes Dancefortwo's post:
  • GenesisNemesis
Reply
#90

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 11:13 PM)Lion IRC Wrote: When someone says Odin, I know who they really mean.

(Springy G raises eyebrow as She reaches for rune bag)  Don't. Dis. My. Dad.
The following 3 users Like Astreja's post:
  • Lion IRC, TheGentlemanBastard, GenesisNemesis
Reply
#91

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 10:23 PM)Lion IRC Wrote: Upper Case Epistemics.
Italicised words are ontologically valid...
FONT SIZE trumps appeal to authority.
Bold CAPS lock beats argumentum ad populam....etc etc
You get the idea.

Isn't that just what you thumpers call Tuesday?!? [Image: Eye_Roll.gif]
[Image: Bastard-Signature.jpg]
The following 1 user Likes TheGentlemanBastard's post:
  • GenesisNemesis
Reply
#92

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 10:06 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: The bible is claiming a reality that doesn't exist.   People weren't buried after crucifixion and they certainly wouldn't have been allowed a burial by a Jew hating tyrant like Pontius Pilate.

Again, you're welcome to your opinion, but that's all it is. Your logic fails.
Reply
#93

Crucifixion argument....
When you're asking why a Christian is capitalizing words referring to Jesus, you're out of serious arguments.
Reply
#94

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 11:21 AM)Percie Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 10:06 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: The bible is claiming a reality that doesn't exist.   People weren't buried after crucifixion and they certainly wouldn't have been allowed a burial by a Jew hating tyrant like Pontius Pilate.

Again, you're welcome to your opinion, but that's all it is. Your logic fails.

Actually it has nothing to do with logic.
It has only to do with known history, and what history knows the Romans did in the provinces with most of their crucified dead.
The following 4 users Like Bucky Ball's post:
  • Dom, SYZ, GenesisNemesis, brunumb
Reply
#95

Crucifixion argument....
(05-07-2021, 02:17 PM)Percie Wrote: I don't see four months as "so soon," but if it makes you happy, go for it!

LOL... so this guy doesn't even have the courage of his own convictions.

Percie Wrote:Yeah, I'm done with this site. Monday, January 4th, 2021, 03:08 AM
I'm a creationist;   I believe that man created God.
Reply
#96

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 12:51 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote: Actually it has nothing to do with logic.

He tried to make it about logic.

Quote:It has only to do with known history, and what history knows the Romans did in the provinces with most of their crucified dead.

Key word bolded. He tried to use logic to change the most to all. It doesn't work. Most A have property X, therefore all A have property X  is not logically valid. You know that.
Reply
#97

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 11:21 AM)Percie Wrote:
(05-07-2021, 10:06 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: The bible is claiming a reality that doesn't exist.   People weren't buried after crucifixion and they certainly wouldn't have been allowed a burial by a Jew hating tyrant like Pontius Pilate.

Again, you're welcome to your opinion, but that's all it is. Your logic fails.

This old book claims stories happened that defy all the physics of the universe and all  the known properties of nature, show me where my logic fails when I disbelieve the ridiculous claimes it makes.
                                                         T4618
Reply
#98

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 02:08 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: This old book claims stories happened that defy all the physics of the universe and all  the known properties of nature, show me where my logic fails when I disbelieve the ridiculous claimes it makes.

I already have. The above is a red herring, as getting permission to bury a body doesn't defy any of the properties of nature.

That's the interesting thing to me. Why not simply say I don't believe supernatural claims ? Why do you need to also try to disparage Biblical accounts which aren't supernatural?

As atheists point out, you only disbelieve one more god than I do. Yet I have no desire to dispute ordinary claims made by other religions' texts. Seems like an odd hobby to me. I'd rather play Fortnite or go for a walk.
Reply
#99

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 02:15 PM)Percie Wrote:
(05-08-2021, 02:08 PM)Dancefortwo Wrote: This old book claims stories happened that defy all the physics of the universe and all  the known properties of nature, show me where my logic fails when I disbelieve the ridiculous claimes it makes.

I already have. The above is a red herring, as getting permission to bury a body doesn't defy any of the properties of nature.

That's the interesting thing to me. Why not simply say I don't believe supernatural claims ? Why do you need to also try to disparage Biblical accounts which aren't supernatural?

As atheists point out, you only disbelieve one more god than I do. Yet I have no desire to dispute ordinary claims made by other religions' texts. Seems like an odd hobby to me. I'd rather play Fortnite or go for a walk.

When three accounts of an event don't agree with each other, there's reason for heightened skepticism. In court, it's "false in one, false in all." Why not the same here?
[Image: sea-stones-whimsy-7-sm.jpg]
Reply

Crucifixion argument....
(05-08-2021, 02:46 PM)Dānu Wrote: When three accounts of an event don't agree with each other, there's reason for heightened skepticism.  In court, it's "false in one, false in all." Why not the same here?

No, that legal principle doesn't apply to discrepancies among witnesses, which is common.

Since you bring up law, one principle which does apply to this case is lex specialis, which means that the specific overrides the general.

But why are you going so broad instead of addressing the issue at hand? Do you agree that his logic is faulty?
The following 1 user Likes Percie's post:
  • Lion IRC
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)