Historical Jesus, Biblical Jesus

[jerry mcmasters]

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

define both then....

I already did in my first post in your thread lol.

your formatting is punk move

[EvieTheAvocado]

define both then....

I already did in my first post in your thread lol.

your formatting is punk move

What does that mean?

[jerry mcmasters]

YOUR FORMATTING IS PUNK MOVE

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

The historical Jesus was just some nice wise dude who inspired people and then got killed. Kinda like Socrates but without the high intelligence, without the curiosity so high and question-asking so obsessive that it was borderline O.C.D., and without the far more noble and dignified death story.

The supernatural Jesus was just a magic man who had magic powers and created the universe.

Definitely different dudes.

how do you know>?

[EvieTheAvocado]

The historical Jesus was just some nice wise dude who inspired people and then got killed. Kinda like Socrates but without the high intelligence, without the curiosity so high and question-asking so obsessive that it was borderline O.C.D., and without the far more noble and dignified death story.

The supernatural Jesus was just a magic man who had magic powers and created the universe.

Definitely different dudes.

how do you know>?

See my previous post about how definitions are made up.

[jerry mcmasters]

He just didn't say it loud enough Evie.

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

The historical Jesus was just some nice wise dude who inspired people and then got killed. Kinda like Socrates but without the high intelligence, without the curiosity so high and question-asking so obsessive that it was borderline O.C.D., and without the far more noble and dignified death story.

The supernatural Jesus was just a magic man who had magic powers and created the universe.

Definitely different dudes.

how do you know>?

See my previous post about how definitions are made up.

so you made up the defintions, you are the source
thanks puss

[EvieTheAvocado]

He just didn't say it loud enough Evie.

Show ContentSpoiler:

[...]
[A door squeaks downstairs.]

            Hah!  No, no.  Hahhh...

[Another squeak.]

            It's bloody Eddie!  It's bloody Eddie, sneaking in to get me when
            I switch the lights out.  Well I've got a surprise for him.
            Where's my cricket bat?

[Footsteps approach the door.  Someone knocks hard three times.]

            Come in!

[Dramatic music as a tall figure in a black cloak and cowl, carrying a scythe,
enters.  Richie cowers in terror.]

            Are you?  Have you come from?  No, no...  Oh my God!  The moon's
            up!  Oh my God!  She was right!  She was right!  Oh my God!
            Jesus H. Corbett!  I mean Christ!  This can't be happening to me!
            No, come on, come on, let's be English about this.  Excuse me!
            This is a private house. If you don't clear off my property
            immediately I shall be forced to call the police!

[The figure crosses to the phone, yanks the cord out of the wall, and throws
the phone through the window.]

            Okay, point taken.  So this is it is it?  Ahhh-h, I have no time,
            I am not ready!  Have I got time to change?  I can't really go up
            there in my jimmy-jams, can I?  What would Saint Pete think?
            They do call him Saint Pete, don't they?  First impressions are
            terribly important, I always think.  Unless...  Whi-which way am
            I going?  Up, or...

[Death raises his arm high, pointing up..]

            Ahhh.

[..and then plunges it down.]

            Arrghhhh!  Ahh, aghh, ahh... no, no, no, no, no...

[Richie starts sobbing.  Death staggers against the wall.  He raises his cowl
- it is Eddie.  Richie doesn't notice.]

            Wait!  Wait!  What about chess?
Eddie:       What about it?
Richie:      Hoohh!  Why don't we play a game of chess?
Eddie:       Umm... because I don't know the rules!
Richie:      Well, that's all right, I'll teach you the rules.
Eddie:       No.  You won't need rules where you're going mate.  You'll need
            asbestos underpants!  'Cause you're going downstairs, me old
            cocker!  Ooh, the moans.  Ooh, the screams.  Ooh, the countless
            billions thrown naked into the pit.
Richie:      Ah-hhhh-aaawww- naked?  Hworrggh!  Wait, wait, wait.  What about
            Cluedo?
Eddie:       Nah, they tried it once mate, but all the pieces caught fire.
Richie:      No no no, I mean why don't we play Cluedo for my life?
Eddie:       Because you always cheat!  You always look at the mystery cards!
Richie:      How do you know these things?
Eddie:       I'm Death!
Richie:      Sorry.  [Shouting.]  How do you know these things?
Eddie:       No, I'm Death!  I'm Death!
Richie:      Oh, if only Eddie were here.[...]

Taken from the script for the British Sitcom "Bottom", episode "Apocalypse" Scene 5

[EvieTheAvocado]

how do you know>?

See my previous post about how definitions are made up.

so you made up the defintions, you are the source
thanks puss

As I already said, newsflash: Literally all definitions are made up.

The real question here is: What exactly is the point of this thread if this is how you are going to respond to the answers?

It's like your absolute truth thread. Oher people made good contributions but all your posts were very poor quality.

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

MY SHIT IS GETTING SOFTER, TRY ADDRESSING THE OP DUCMCUNT

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

HERE ILL MAKE IT EASY PEASY, WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE RUMOR THAT BIBLICAL JESUS AND HISTORICAL JESUS ARE DIFFERENT?

[EvieTheAvocado]

MY SHIT IS GETTING SOFTER, TRY ADDRESSING THE OP DUCMCUNT

I'm not interested in the hardness of your stools or lack thereof. What does that mean? What's a "ducm"?

As for Kant ... he was a pretty smart guy. Nothing wrong with being a Kant.

I addressed the OP from the very beginning. You asked for the difference between the two and I told you. The Biblical Jesus has magic powers and the historical Jesus doesn't.

[jerry mcmasters]

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

MY SHIT IS GETTING SOFTER, TRY ADDRESSING THE OP DUCMCUNT

I'm not interested in the hardness of your stools or lack thereof. What does that mean? What's a "ducm"?

As for Kant ... he was a pretty smart guy. Nothing wrong with being a Kant.

I addressed the OP from the very beginning. You asked for the difference between the two and I told you. The Biblical Jesus has magic powers and the historical Jesus doesn't.

just some random shit?
who is historical jesus?
what do you base that on?

[EvieTheAvocado]

MY SHIT IS GETTING SOFTER, TRY ADDRESSING THE OP DUCMCUNT

I'm not interested in the hardness of your stools or lack thereof. What does that mean? What's a "ducm"?

As for Kant ... he was a pretty smart guy. Nothing wrong with being a Kant.

I addressed the OP from the very beginning. You asked for the difference between the two and I told you. The Biblical Jesus has magic powers and the historical Jesus doesn't.

just some random shit?
who is historical jesus?
what do you base that on?

Nothing I said was random.

Well by "historical Jesus" I assume you meant the non-supernatural Jesus.

And obviously, the supernatural and non-supernatural Jesus can't be the same thing.

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

I'm not interested in the hardness of your stools or lack thereof. What does that mean? What's a "ducm"?

As for Kant ... he was a pretty smart guy. Nothing wrong with being a Kant.

I addressed the OP from the very beginning. You asked for the difference between the two and I told you. The Biblical Jesus has magic powers and the historical Jesus doesn't.

just some random shit?
who is historical jesus?
what do you base that on?

Well by "historical Jesus" I assume you meant the non-supernatural Jesus.

And obviously, the supernatural and non-supernatural Jesus can't be the same thing.

ok I am starting to folow you here, but i gotta reply with something besides acolades if you understand

[EvieTheAvocado]

just some random shit?
who is historical jesus?
what do you base that on?

Well by "historical Jesus" I assume you meant the non-supernatural Jesus.

And obviously, the supernatural and non-supernatural Jesus can't be the same thing.

ok I am starting to folow you here, but i gotta reply with something besides acolades if you understand

I struggle to understand you because your English is very poor.

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

is because i can only type 32 wpm and i dont back up

[jerry mcmasters]

Schrodinger's Outlaw, all jokes aside it seems there is some larger point you are trying to make or lead us to. What is it? There may or may not have been something we can call a "historical" Jesus. Wouldn't be impossible, wandering creepy I'm The Son Of God types are littered throughout history. I could throw a rock from where I sit right now and hit a couple. But no atheist or reasonable person thinks there was a Jesus as described in the bible. What's so complicated about all this?

[Old Man Marsh]

Feeling alone and you're all alone.
Flesh and blood by the telephone.
Pick up the receiver, I'll make you a believer.

[jerry mcmasters]

Feeling alone and you're all alone.
Flesh and blood by the telephone.
Pick up the receiver, I'll make you a believer.

Now that's stuck in my head.  Thanks OMM!

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

Schrodinger's Outlaw, all jokes aside it seems there is some larger point you are trying to make or lead us to.  What is it?  There may or may not have been something we can call a "historical" Jesus.  Wouldn't be impossible, wandering creepy I'm The Son Of God types are littered throughout history.  I could throw a rock from where I sit right now and hit a couple.  But no atheist or reasonable person thinks there was a Jesus as described in the bible.  What's so complicated about all this?

hmm... if I answer this out of order evie the avacado will object
if it weren't for the bible there would be no discussion about a guy named mud, elmer or charlie being jesus.

[Schrodinger's Outlaw]

Well by "historical Jesus" I assume you meant the non-supernatural Jesus.

And obviously, the supernatural and non-supernatural Jesus can't be the same thing.

ok I am starting to folow you here, but i gotta reply with something besides acolades if you understand

I struggle to understand you because your English is very poor.

yeah it is because I gotta format and all that stuff but I don't like to

[jerry mcmasters]

Schrodinger's Outlaw, all jokes aside it seems there is some larger point you are trying to make or lead us to.  What is it?  There may or may not have been something we can call a "historical" Jesus.  Wouldn't be impossible, wandering creepy I'm The Son Of God types are littered throughout history.  I could throw a rock from where I sit right now and hit a couple.  But no atheist or reasonable person thinks there was a Jesus as described in the bible.  What's so complicated about all this?

if it weren't for the bible there would be no discussion about a guy named mud, elmer or charlie being jesus.

True.  And outside the bible there isn't even a peep about him, so I feel I could be totally wrong and the guy may not have existed at all.  But I feel stronger there's enough "behind the curtain" stuff that there was a Jesus behind it all.