Michio Kaku never met a camera he didn't like.
Welcome to Atheist Discussion, a new community created by former members of The Thinking Atheist forum.
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0
|
05-02-2021, 06:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-02-2021, 06:47 AM by Cavebear.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0 (05-02-2021, 06:03 AM)Inkubus Wrote: Michio Kaku never met a camera he didn't like. I agree with Michio Kaku that answers to questions are probably simpler than we think. Every century or so, some person has an insight that is obvious in retrospect or test. Kepler: Equal time through equal planetary orbit areas. Newton: The equation for universal gravitation. Einstein: E = mc2 Who is next? Because there has to be some simplification coming.
Never try to catch a dropped knife!
(05-02-2021, 06:46 AM)Cavebear Wrote:(05-02-2021, 06:03 AM)Inkubus Wrote: Michio Kaku never met a camera he didn't like. The "simplification" has relied on better mathematics, in the cases of Newton (invented calculus to get the job done) and Einstein, who used tensor calculus and Riemannian geometry.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
A giant leap foreword using gene-editing, (CRISPR).
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shot...stopped-it https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107454
Test
Dark wings supercharge seabird flight
"Most birds that swoop over ocean waters have one thing in common: dark wings. Now scientists think they know why. Dark feathers absorb more heat, which improves flight efficiency, allowing these birds to fly faster and longer than those with lighter-colored wings." We had a nasty storm about a week ago and when I went biking the next day I saw that one of the (many) stork's nests in a nearby village had fallen I did contact the responsible authorities (though this isn't our strong suit) and maybe the people who live there did too... Anyway, when I went there several days later, there was a mini-nest - I guess someone must have straightened the nesting platform* (as it was vertical after the storm) and maybe built a bit of a nest. So this made me feel a bit better... but there's been only one stork in the nestlet ever since... I'm afraid the rest of his/her family might have died. I didn't see any dead storks but the people living there might have taken them away... they might have been taken to a clinic for treatment but I think it would have made the local news and I haven't read anything... All I know is, I'm really sad... hopefully the nest will get rebuilt for next year... We're bound to be getting more nasty storms this summer, with this infernal heat... and now I'll be worried for the rest of the storks * A lot of the lampposts have those platforms specifically for the storks to build their nests on:
“We drift down time, clutching at straws. But what good's a brick to a drowning man?”
(Whereas Musk would send a submarine *and* call the comet a pedophile )
“We drift down time, clutching at straws. But what good's a brick to a drowning man?”
07-13-2021, 01:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-13-2021, 04:47 PM by Inkubus.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0 (07-13-2021, 11:43 AM)Vera Wrote: Love it. The final frame; I thought Bezos would encourage Branson to crash into it. How long was Branson in space for? Depending on who you ask, either a matter of minutes or no time at all.
07-15-2021, 04:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2021, 04:58 PM by Dānu.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0 Quote:In a medical first, researchers harnessed the brainwaves of a paralyzed man unable to speak and turned what he intended to say into sentences on a computer screen.
Mountain-high though the difficulties appear, terrible and gloomy though all things seem, they are but Mâyâ.
Fear not — it is banished. Crush it, and it vanishes. Stamp upon it, and it dies. Vivekananda
I heard about this on BBC yesterday - fascinating! The man must feel so relieved to be able to communicate again. He must have felt so trapped.
________________________________________________
A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein Quote:New Scientist:
Why do they say 'volcanic rock' and not magma. It's the same thing I know but volcanic rock shoots out of, well, volcanos and there were no volcanos at that point in solar system evolution.
(08-09-2021, 03:11 PM)Inkubus Wrote: Why do they say 'volcanic rock' and not magma. It's the same thing I know but volcanic rock shoots out of, well, volcanos and there were no volcanos at that point in solar system evolution. They call it volcanic rock because magma refers specifically to that rock in a liquid or semi-liquid form. Calling it volcanic is still a bit of a misnomer since, as you pointed out, there weren't any volcanoes yet. But, there were plenty of ways to melt the rocks and I'm not sure we really have a good term for 'igneous rocks that used to be molten' other than volcanic.
I'd assume it's described as "volcanic" rock because the meteorite's
origin was possibly from a volcano on another planetary body in the solar system? Maybe Venus, Io, Triton, or Enceladus? —Dunno really I'm a creationist; I believe that man created God.
10-15-2021, 08:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-15-2021, 08:18 PM by Bucky Ball.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0
This is a little exciting, who knows what will come of it ?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...114031.htm "The algae actually produced so much oxygen that they could bring the nerve cells back to life, if you will,"
Test
10-15-2021, 10:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-15-2021, 10:09 PM by Inkubus.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0
Aye that is curious I wonder what the algae are metabolising to produce the oxygen, it doesn't say.
^ That would be CO2 from metabolic waste.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Quote:CNN:
12-14-2021, 05:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-14-2021, 05:29 PM by Alan V.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0 Quote:Wikipedia: Since it has to move into a distant orbit so it won't be blinded by the infrared from the Earth, it won't be sending back pictures for a half year or so. It has a special shield to block light from the Sun. (12-14-2021, 05:04 PM)Alan V Wrote:Quote:Wikipedia: It cost 10 billion dollars or so. Let's hope nothing goes wrong.
Test
(12-14-2021, 05:58 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:(12-14-2021, 05:04 PM)Alan V Wrote:Quote:Wikipedia: NASA's lifetime cost will be US$9.7 billion. Just a thought here... would that money be better spent on the exploration of the 71 per cent of the earth's surface that's covered with oceans? Could it be that what we can farm from the oceans and how we can use salt water (in a more technologically-advanced near future) be the logical way to go? Its tasks include "observing some of the most distant events and objects in the universe ". How exactly does this help us solve the escalating negative effects of climate change—increasing droughts, wild fires and flooding, tornadoes, lack of potable water, crop failures and death rates here on the planet, with its "self-contained" fragile ecosystem? I'm a creationist; I believe that man created God.
12-14-2021, 06:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-14-2021, 06:40 PM by Bucky Ball.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0 (12-14-2021, 06:27 PM)SYZ Wrote:(12-14-2021, 05:58 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:(12-14-2021, 05:04 PM)Alan V Wrote: Since it has to move into a distant orbit so it won't be blinded by the infrared from the Earth, it won't be sending back pictures for a half year or so. It has a special shield to block light from the Sun. It's not a zero sum thing. Other money should be spent on the things you mention. Humanity needs to stretch it's imagination. The US needs huge desalination plants up and down the West Coast, to solve the water shortage. It's entirely possible. Israel did it.
Test
Beaming solar energy from space to Earth.
https://www.defensenews.com/battlefield-...-to-earth/ One vaccine for all the COVID and SARS variants. https://www.defenseone.com/technology/20...ts/360089/
Test
I can't wrap my head around the complexities of the universe.
So I eat cake and smoke and put it to the back of my mind. I've come to the conclusion that it doesn't matter how much or how little we know. Nothing will change in reality.
12-23-2021, 04:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-23-2021, 05:00 AM by Bucky Ball.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0 (12-23-2021, 12:18 AM)Thingymebob Wrote: I can't wrap my head around the complexities of the universe. You changed, and a great deal has changed in reality. A very very great deal indeed. Your brain changed, knowing about galaxies, supernovae, quasars, relativity, knowing that complexity, knowing about dark matter and dark energy, about uncertainty and entanglement, ... knowing that the fundamentals of quantum mechanics do not appear to be intuitive/logical to the human brain, knowing reality does not follow what we think is "logical", (thus destroying ALL the arguments of religious fundies, who claim their gods are "necessary" because their logic demands it, knowing the Pauli Exclusion Principle, knowing that electrons are waves, knowing there is a Higgs boson, and even knowing this : which we heard about yesterday : https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/asia/baby...index.html , knowing about "spooky action at a distance" (entanglement), , knowing that Archaeology and chemistry and physics have debunked virtually all of two (maybe three) of the world's major religious groups' historical claims, knowing there may be other universes and how we might detect them, We know all kinds of things about medicine, genetics and neuro-science we didn't know, even twenty years ago. If you came in to the ED with a basilar artery stroke, they could pull out the clot, and you would go home (walking out the door), in a couple days, instead of living as a vegie for the rest of your life, in a nursing home. You're 100 % wrong. Everything changes.
Test
12-23-2021, 11:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-23-2021, 11:09 AM by Alan V.)
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0 (12-23-2021, 12:18 AM)Thingymebob Wrote: I can't wrap my head around the complexities of the universe. No one person can wrap their head around the complexities of the universe. That's why we have so many specialists. That's why we explore. That's why we communicate with each other -- to at least try to understand in general. These days, learning is a life-long endeavor even for the well-informed. So lucky for you that you now have access to a forum full of mostly smart and well-informed people. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)