Welcome to Atheist Discussion, a new community created by former members of The Thinking Atheist forum.

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0
#76

The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0
Michio Kaku never met a camera he didn't like.
Reply
#77

The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0
(05-02-2021, 06:03 AM)Inkubus Wrote: Michio Kaku never met a camera he didn't like.

I agree with Michio Kaku that answers to questions are probably simpler than we think.  Every century or so, some person has an insight that is obvious in retrospect or test.  

Kepler:  Equal time through equal planetary orbit areas.

Newton:  The equation for universal gravitation.

Einstein:  E = mc2

Who is next? Because there has to be some simplification coming.
Atheist born and when I die, still an atheist...
Reply
#78

The Elegant Nature of Science 2.0
(05-02-2021, 06:46 AM)Cavebear Wrote:
(05-02-2021, 06:03 AM)Inkubus Wrote: Michio Kaku never met a camera he didn't like.

I agree with Michio Kaku that answers to questions are probably simpler than we think.  Every century or so, some person has an insight that is obvious in retrospect or test.  

Kepler:  Equal time through equal planetary orbit areas.

Newton:  The equation for universal gravitation.

Einstein:  E = mc2

Who is next?  Because there has to be some simplification coming.

The "simplification" has relied on better mathematics, in the cases of Newton (invented calculus to get the job done) and Einstein, who used tensor calculus and Riemannian geometry.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)