05-01-2019, 05:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-01-2019, 05:21 PM by Aliza.)
Climate Change
Climate Change
Thank you, @"Thoreauvian". Looking at the sources DeltaBravo has provided:
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/...tists-many
Just glancing at the Frasier Institute, this looks like it's more about Canadian policy rather than actual science. I didn't dig deep, but with the heavy emphasis on economics, I think this site is more about pushing political agendas.
https://nsidc.org/news/inthenews/antarct...ecord-rate
NSIDC.org looks good, but all they're doing is listing a broken link an article published by Live Trading News. This source doesn't look very reliable for science issues.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/02/24/s...this-year/
This passes my initial sniff test. Not gonna say that I really dug into the blog owners credentials, but taking him at face value, it would appear that he's a retired TV meteorologist who has listed their peer reviewed publications. Agree with him or not, I think the source is probably okay.
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-big-u-turn...acier.html
This is a good source.
Edited to add:
http://principia-scientific.org/publicat...sphere.pdf
This guy is a known climate denier, but if his credentials are to be believed, then it would seem he's qualified to come to a different conclusion then the rest of the science community. Is anyone questioning the credentials of the paper's author?
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/...tists-many
Just glancing at the Frasier Institute, this looks like it's more about Canadian policy rather than actual science. I didn't dig deep, but with the heavy emphasis on economics, I think this site is more about pushing political agendas.
https://nsidc.org/news/inthenews/antarct...ecord-rate
NSIDC.org looks good, but all they're doing is listing a broken link an article published by Live Trading News. This source doesn't look very reliable for science issues.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/02/24/s...this-year/
This passes my initial sniff test. Not gonna say that I really dug into the blog owners credentials, but taking him at face value, it would appear that he's a retired TV meteorologist who has listed their peer reviewed publications. Agree with him or not, I think the source is probably okay.
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-big-u-turn...acier.html
This is a good source.
Edited to add:
http://principia-scientific.org/publicat...sphere.pdf
This guy is a known climate denier, but if his credentials are to be believed, then it would seem he's qualified to come to a different conclusion then the rest of the science community. Is anyone questioning the credentials of the paper's author?